The “hidden music” of Zen practice

I started sitting zazen last month. Two or three times a week, I go to the San Francisco Zen Center and practice 30 minutes of “sitting absorption.” And practice is the right word because I have yet to feel that I am doing it right. Still, it’s refreshing and I keep coming back.

About ten minutes before the meditation period begins, a monk taps out a series of rhythms, hitting a hanging wooden board (han) with a mallet. The process is repeated several times until the soft gong peal is sounded that signals the beginning of the zazen. Then for 30 minutes I sit quietly on a cushion, facing the wall, trying not to think. Thoughts come and thoughts go but mostly I notice the sounds. Traffic passing – the sounds of the building creaking or footsteps on a stairway or plumbing sounds – and the coughing of others sitting in the Zendo (it seems for some a half hour of zazen is like the first ten minutes at the symphony: a time to fidget and clear your throat). My fidgeting is all internal. It only stops when I begin to focus in on the sounds. When I began sitting, I was convinced that if I listened closely enough, a pattern would emerge and I’d hear the music of everyday life. Then I realized that listening to the ambient sounds that come and go around me during a sitting is engrossing and worth the time but it isn’t music. There is no intentionality present, no one is organizing the sounds and silences into meaningful patterns (or subverting those patterns) to transform them into music. When the gong sounds signaling the end of zazen, the sounds go on but I shift my attention back to the everyday and, listening in a different way, I hear them differently. I’m not disappointed I didn’t find a hidden layer of music underlying everything. What I did find is that listening deeply is deeply rewarding regardless of what you find.

 

Inscription on a Han (English translation)

 

 

Shunryu Suzuki Roshi (founder of the S.F. Zen Center)

 

Buddhist monks make the best nightclub doormen.

You’ve seen him outside the door of the club, checking the list for your name. You ask him to check even if you’re not on the list, knowing he’ll decide if you make the cut – if you’re cool enough. Shaved head, an imposing build, a steady gaze. Some local nightclubs used to import doormen from Manhattan. Local doormen didn’t seem to have the right mix of imperturbable cool and restrained intimidation needed to work a high-class line. When you need cool and intimidation, call New York. It’s no longer necessary, I’ve found a local alternative.

He caught my eye as I walked into the Zendo and leaned ever so slightly into my path, asking, “What’s your name?” I told him and he asked me if I was there for the sitting. I said I was and he started over:

“What’s your name?”

I told him and he asked, “Are you here for the one-day sitting?”

I said I wasn’t and he told me there wasn’t any room in the Zendo but I could sit in the entryway. I bowed and left slightly abashed.

With no false bravado, I can say that it was the first time, I had been turned down at the door. And I’d never felt so handled. The man in the dark blue robes with the shaved head wasn’t physically imposing but he had a quiet intensity and a fixity of purpose that was more effectively intimidating than any man mountain who I’ve encountered working a velvet rope.

Exploring the boundary between sound & music 2:1

Interesting article from Music Think Tank

If a Tree Falls in the Woods Can You Call It Music?

By Keith Andrew

Recently I was reading some material on the controversial yet highly influential experimental composer John Cage –most widely known for his ‘piece’ 4’33” which if you are not familiar with, is 4’33” of silence. A bold statement indeed.

Now, don’t get me wrong- I respect John Cage. In fact I respect most anyone who is willing to explore and push the boundaries of any convention- musical, artistic, philosophical or otherwise. I may think they are wrong; I may think they are foolish or perhaps even dangerous, but I still can find something to respect in their willingness to reach for or beyond something where most are not willing to reach. From these pioneers of exploration we can usually find something of value in their endeavors even if the mission turns up nothing or ends in complete failure and disaster. There is usually some insight to be gained from another’s missteps -however well intentioned they may have been.

Woody Allen said that if you are not making mistakes you are not making progress. So let us indeed be willing to make a mistake as we refuse to play it safe while reaching for something we have not yet seen or achieved.

That being said, and after all due respect being given, on the subject of music, sound and purpose, I could not disagree with John Cage more and I think he is very mistaken. (To read more, click here).

Exploring the Boundary between Sound & Music 1:3 [Soundwave ((4)) green sound debuts in San Francisco June 6, 2010]

When I teach classes that look at music in cross-cultural settings, I always begin by having the class come up with a working definition of music . The goal is to arrive at a definition that is broad enough to apply to all forms of experience thought of as music but precise enough to distinguish music as a particular form of experience. Typically, the definition arrived at is something like this (composed by a Music of the Americas class at USF):

“Music is an art form that organizes audible sounds and silences.”

Now you might argue that humans need to be referenced somewhere in there; someone has to do the organizing. And can there be non-human music? Animals and other natural phenomena create organized presentations of sounds and silences — bird songs, pounding rain, melting glaciers — that sound musical but is that music. If you break music down into its component parts (pitch, rhythm, timbre, dynamics), you can find them all in natural occurrences of musical sound. And those component parts can all be broken down into patterns of vibration, the most basic non-stuff (without it there is no here, here). Is it human agency the sine qua non of music? What then is sound art, particularly when it involves the human manipulation or re-creation of natural sounds? Soundwave ((4)) green sound, a festival of environmentally themed sound performances, debuts in San Francisco on June 6, 2010 and offers a myriad of settings in which to ponder that question.


ME’DI.ATE’s Soundwave Festival is San Francisco’s premier experiential arts festival held every two years over the span of two months over the summer. Bringing together sound purveyors from across the sonic spectrum (from sound art to experimental to classical to popular music), Soundwave presents innovative performances and activities that challenge the way audiences see and hear sound and music. Each season investigates a new idea through sound that incites diverse artists and musicians to create work that explores the season’s theme in new and innovative directions.

Exploring the boundary between sound & music – 1:2

When do natural sounds become “music”? Is a sound installation a musical performance?

From the extraordinary blog Everyday Listening:

Chris Watson’s Whispering in the Leaves is an extraordinary sound installation, using recordings and natural history broadcast to transport us to the far-flung, dense rainforests of South and Central America. Throughout Kew Gardens’ Summer festival, the Palm House will be diffused with the dawn and dusk choruses of the myriad of creatures native to these lush tropical landscapes.

In a short documentary on Vimeo,  Chris Watson talks about Whispering In The Leaves, which bring to London audiences the sound of places most will never hear (at least in person): Whispering in the Leaves on Vimeo.

Exploring the boundary between music & sound – 1:1

In Noise: The Political Economy of Music (1985), Jacque Attali wrote about the socially constructed and historically changing boundaries between music and noise. Brilliant, provocative but I think there is one missing component in Attali’s approach: the distinction between music and sound. It is outside the frame of the questions Attali was exploring at the time but it raises a bunch of interesting questions because there is on easy equivalence between sound and noise — a piece of sound art or an everyday sound can be pleasant, even musical but not fall into the category of music. In the next few months, I’m going to be exploring the boundary between music and sound and the uncertain ground upon which the very definition of the terms resides. As a beginning, let’s consider the field recordings of Andres Bick of the Dispersion of Sound Waves in Ice Sheets — sound? noise? music? Click on the link then you be the judge and let me know what you think and why.

Dispersion of Sound Waves in Ice Sheets

Notes:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 104 other followers